I used to think that Reid's brewery had totally disappeared. It was situated on the junction of Clerkenwell Road and Leather Lane. The site is currently occupied by a block of housing. But there was another part of the brewery on the other side of Leather Lane and part of that survives.Though the name Reid lived on for several decades as a Stout brand of Watney's.
I really should do more with the Reid brewing records I have photos of. I've not gone through them all properly yet. Not sure why, as they were the first ones I collected around ten years ago.
Back to their tied houses. If you remember, Barclay Perkins went from 51 owned pubs in 1830 to 29 in 1875. But for a large part of the period inbetween the numbers were quite stable. At Reid, there was a fall pretty much throughout and resulted in them owning less than a third as many pubs as when they started.
It's frustrating that the table doesn't extend a little later. Because I'm sure the trend towards sales rather purchases would have been reversed. I think the trends in pub ownership can be accounted for by licensing legislation.
Why would a brewers start selling off pubs after 1830? It must surely be connected with the Beer Act of that year. The thing that established beer houses and led to a big increase in the number of pubs, especially in London. As a consequence, they were more outlets for a brewer to choose from, meaning there wasn't such a big need to own pubs.
The beer house provisions in the Beer Act were mostly reversed by the 1869 Licensing Act. This made it nigh on impossible to obtain a new pub licence and even actively tried to reduce the number of licensed premises. Making outlets scarcer and more difficult to obtain. Leading to a mad rush to buy pubs.
Here's the table:
Reid tied houses and free trade 1830 - 1875 | |||||||||
Year | Owned | % | Loan | % | Free | % | total | barrels brewed | barrels per pub |
1830 | 168 | 27.3 | 355 | 57.7 | 92 | 15 | 615 | 127,220 | 206.86 |
1835 | 142 | 23.7 | 338 | 56.2 | 121 | 21.2 | 601 | 181,187 | 301.48 |
1840 | 122 | 19.7 | 360 | 58.3 | 136 | 22 | 618 | 195,169 | 315.81 |
1845 | 120 | 18.2 | 406 | 61.6 | 133 | 20.2 | 659 | 227,306 | 344.93 |
1850 | 120 | 17.2 | 391 | 55.9 | 188 | 26.9 | 699 | 213,345 | 305.21 |
1855 | 107 | 15.7 | 378 | 55.4 | 197 | 28.9 | 682 | 179,217 | 262.78 |
1860 | 96 | 12.8 | 384 | 51.2 | 270 | 36 | 750 | 288,597 | 384.8 |
1865 | 76 | 9.2 | 394 | 47.8 | 355 | 43 | 825 | 277,757 | 336.68 |
1870 | 55 | 6 | 407 | 44.7 | 438 | 49.3 | 900 | 264,753 | 294.17 |
1875 | 52 | 6 | 391 | 44.8 | 430 | 49.2 | 873 | 235,596 | 269.87 |
Sources: | |||||||||
The British Brewing Industry 1830 - 1980 by T.R. Gourvish and R.G. Wilson, 1994, page 131. | |||||||||
Whitbread brewing log, document LMA/4453/D/09/023 | |||||||||
"The British Brewing Industry, 1830-1980" T. R. Gourvish & R.G. Wilson, pages 610-611 |
Are the old Reid records something that would work for Lets Brews? Would they be interesting things for home brewers to take a stab at making? Or do they involve too much guess work to translate to the typical home setup?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous,
ReplyDeletethere's a Reid IPA in the Home Brewer's Guide to British Beer. The records are reasonably detailed, so they're OK for translating into recipes.