But this article isn’t what it first appears to be. It’s not si much a call for cheaper beer as weaker beer. I’ll explain why after.
“CALL FOR A CHEAPER BEER
At a special meeting yesterday the board of the Licensed Victuallers’ Central Protection Society of London was agreed to recommend to the brewers the brewing of standard 6d. mild ale instead of a 7d. beer, which it was felt would generally beyond the reach of the working man.
In those areas where a lower-price beer was in demand it was recommended that Beer should brewed for sale at 5d. per pint.”
Portsmouth Evening News - Wednesday 16 September 1931, page 3.
You have to understand the context. This is just after the disastrous Snowden emergency budget of 1931. It put the price of beer up by about 1d a pint,. The strongest type of Mild Ale, which sold for 6d a pint, went up to 7d. Or would have, if brewers hadn’t cut the strength so they could still charge the old price.
Do I have any evidence of this? Of course I do. Lots of it.
This is how Milds looked in 1930:
Mild Ale in 1930 | |||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | Price | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
1930 | Leney & Co | L.A. | 4d | 1025 | 1007.4 | 2.28 | 70.40% |
1930 | Buddon Bigg | Ale | 4d | 1026.5 | |||
1930 | Mackeson | L.A. | 4d | 1027 | 1005.4 | 2.80 | 80.00% |
1930 | Portsmouth & Brighton Breweries | L.A. | 4d | 1027 | 1001.9 | 3.27 | 92.96% |
1930 | Whitbread | LA | 4d | 1027.2 | 1010.0 | 2.28 | 63.27% |
1930 | Style & Winch | Ale | 4d | 1028.2 | |||
1930 | Shepherd Neame | Ale | 4d | 1028.5 | |||
1929 | Barclay Perkins | A | 4d | 1028.7 | 1007.5 | 2.80 | 73.83% |
1930 | Mason | Ale | 4d | 1030.4 | |||
1930 | Tamplin | L.A. | 4d | 1031 | 1007.4 | 3.06 | 76.13% |
1930 | Isleworth Brewery | RA | 4d | 1032 | 1011.2 | 2.69 | 65.00% |
1930 | Kemp Town | L.A. | 4d | 1034 | 1006.7 | 3.55 | 80.29% |
1930 | Fremlin | Ale | 4d | 1035.7 | |||
average 4d | 1029.3 | 1007.2 | 2.84 | 75.24% | |||
1930 | Hammerton | Ale | 5d | 1033.7 | |||
1930 | Wells Watford | Ale | 5d | 1033.7 | |||
1930 | Courage | X | 5d | 1035 | 1009.5 | 3.30 | 72.86% |
1930 | Wenlock | Ale | 5d | 1036.1 | |||
1930 | Cannon | Ale | 5d | 1039.7 | |||
average 5d | 1035.6 | 1009.5 | 3.30 | 72.86% | |||
1930 | Truman | X | 6d | 1042 | 1008.9 | 4.30 | 78.81% |
1930 | Whitbread | X | 6d | 1042.4 | 1010.0 | 4.28 | 76.40% |
1929 | Barclay Perkins | X | 6d | 1042.6 | 1012.5 | 3.98 | 70.65% |
1930 | Mann Crossman | X | 6d | 1044 | 1007.2 | 4.80 | 83.64% |
1930 | Taylor Walker | X | 6d | 1044 | 1013.3 | 3.98 | 69.77% |
1930 | Watney | X | 6d | 1044 | 1011 | 4.28 | 75.00% |
1930 | Hoare | X | 6d | 1046 | 1014.4 | 4.09 | 68.70% |
average 6d | 1043.6 | 1011.0 | 4.25 | 74.71% | |||
Sources: | |||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001. | |||||||
Whitbread brewing record held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numberLMA/4453/D/01/096. | |||||||
Truman Gravity Book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/252 | |||||||
Barclay Perkins brewing records |
And this is what they were like in 1932:
Mild Ale in 1930 | |||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | Price | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
1932 | Wells Watford | Ale | 4.5d | 1028.7 | |||
1932 | Truman | Ale | 4d | 1029.07 | |||
1932 | Whitbread | LA | 5d | 1026.0 | 1006.5 | 2.58 | 75.00% |
1932 | Watney | Ale | 5d | 1028.8 | |||
1932 | Fullers | Ale | 5d | 1030.1 | |||
1932 | Ind Coope | Ale | 5d | 1030.7 | |||
1932 | Young & Co | Ale | 5d | 1032.8 | |||
average 5d | 1029.6 | 1006.5 | 2.58 | 75.00% | |||
1932 | Hammerton | Ale | 6.5d | 1032 | 1006.4 | 3.32 | 80.00% |
1932 | Whitbread | X | 6d | 1032.6 | 1009.0 | 3.12 | 72.39% |
1932 | Cannon Brewery | X | 6d | 1034 | 1012.2 | 2.82 | 64.12% |
1932 | Taylor Walker | X | 6d | 1034 | 1013.4 | 2.66 | 60.59% |
1932 | Watney | X | 6d | 1034 | 1010.2 | 3.08 | 70.00% |
1932 | Charrington | X | 6d | 1035 | 1011 | 3.11 | 68.57% |
1932 | Courage | X | 6d | 1035 | 1012.2 | 2.95 | 65.14% |
1932 | Mann Crossman | X | 6d | 1035 | 1009.6 | 3.29 | 72.57% |
1932 | Meux | X | 6d | 1035.5 | |||
1932 | Barclay Perkins | X | 6d | 1036 | 1009.3 | 3.46 | 74.17% |
1932 | Truman | X | 6d | 1036 | 1008.8 | 3.53 | 75.56% |
1932 | Hoare | X | 6d | 1038 | 1008.9 | 3.78 | 76.58% |
1932 | Wenlock | X | 6d | 1038 | 1012.2 | 3.34 | 67.89% |
1932 | Mann Crossman | X | 6d | 1041 | 1010.4 | 3.97 | 74.63% |
average 6d | 1035.4 | 1010.3 | 3.26 | 70.94% | |||
1932 | Whitbread | XX | 7d | 1039.0 | 1012.5 | 3.51 | 67.95% |
1932 | Taylor Walker | XXX | 9d | 1048 | 1015.4 | 4.22 | 67.92% |
Sources: | |||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001. | |||||||
Whitbread brewing record held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numberLMA/4453/D/01/098. | |||||||
Truman Gravity Book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/252 |
You can see that in 1932 the average gravity of 5d Milds was virtually identical to the average gravity of 4d Milds in 1930. And a 1932 6d Mild was the same as a 1930 5d Mild.
Note how few examples there are of 7d Mild – just one. Though top marks to Taylor Walker for having a Mild almost of pre-EWW I strength.
Haven't seen a Taylor Walker recipe. Do you ever come across those logs?
ReplyDeleteLady Luck,
ReplyDeleteI don't think any Taylor Walker records survive.