As we gradually move our way down the attenuation scale, you’ll see the FGs rise and ABVs fall. Which is only logical. Though we’ve still got a way to go down that particular road.
There’s a considerable variation in price, not always that directly related to strength. The cheapest, Greenall’s Oatmeal Stout was just 21d – 8.75p in modern money – while the dearest, Mackeson cost 32d (13.33p). That’s almost 50% more, despite there being little difference in ABV. AAs national, heavily-advertised brand, it shouldn’t be a surprise that Mackeson demanded a premium price. The same seems to be true to a lesser extent of Charrington’s Punch Stout.
Just 5 of the 48 examples have the word “sweet” or “glucose” in their name. Almost as many, 4, are Oatmeal Stouts. More surprisingly, there are two Oyster Stouts. How modern.
There’s a reason why there are four analyses of Jubilee Stout. It was another widely available Stout which Whitbread presumably saw as a rival to their own Mackeson brand. A beer which was incredibly important for the company in the 1950’s.
There’s a very good geographical spread of breweries, from Scotland down to Southwest England, with pretty much every region inbetween represented. Including my hometown of Newark-on-Trent, in the form of Holes Castle Stout.
I can’t think of anything else to say. So here’s the table.
Bottled Stout in the 1950's - Standard Stouts 60-65% attenuation | |||||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | Price per pint d | Acidity | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | colour |
1953 | Davenport | Celebration Stout | 22 | 0.06 | 1041.9 | 1014.7 | 3.52 | 64.92% | 1 + 17 |
1953 | Hunt Edmunds | Country Stout | 26 | 0.06 | 1043.8 | 1015.4 | 3.67 | 64.84% | 1 + 15 |
1950 | Castletown | Manx Oyster Stout | 26 | 0.07 | 1043.7 | 1015.4 | 3.66 | 64.76% | 1 + 17 |
1953 | Young & Son | Victory Oyster Stout | 26 | 0.05 | 1046.5 | 1016.4 | 3.89 | 64.73% | 1R + 17B |
1959 | Vaux | Red Label Stout | 28 | 1043.9 | 1015.5 | 3.67 | 64.69% | 300 | |
1957 | Boddingtons | Extra Stout (lactose absent) | 28 | 0.04 | 1043.9 | 1015.6 | 3.66 | 64.46% | 250 |
1951 | Hope & Anchor | Jubilee Stout | 28 | 0.04 | 1041.7 | 1014.9 | 3.46 | 64.27% | |
1953 | Samuel Smith | Sams Stout | 22 | 0.11 | 1043.9 | 1015.7 | 3.64 | 64.24% | 1 + 11 |
1952 | Hammerton | Oatmeal Stout | 29 | 0.07 | 1047.2 | 1017 | 3.90 | 63.98% | 1 + 18.5 |
1959 | Nimmo | Nimmo's Stout | 28 | 1048.2 | 1017.4 | 3.98 | 63.90% | 300 | |
1954 | Bent's | Red Label Stout | 26 | 0.04 | 1049.2 | 1017.8 | 4.06 | 63.82% | 300 |
1959 | Plymouth Breweries | Imperial Brown Stout | 26 | 1045.1 | 1016.4 | 3.71 | 63.64% | 350 | |
1954 | Charrington | Punch Stout | 30 | 0.04 | 1047.5 | 1017.3 | 3.90 | 63.58% | 1 + 18 |
1955 | Devenish | Double Weymouth Sweet Stout | 28 | 0.06 | 1042.8 | 1015.6 | 3.51 | 63.55% | 400 |
1959 | Devenish | Devenish | 28 | 1042.2 | 1015.4 | 3.46 | 63.51% | 350 | |
1953 | James Hole & Co | Castle Stout | 24 | 0.06 | 1041 | 1015 | 3.36 | 63.41% | 1R + 17B |
1951 | Birkenhead Brewery | BB Stout | 26 | 0.11 | 1046.6 | 1017.1 | 3.81 | 63.30% | |
1952 | Hope & Anchor | Jubilee Stout | 28 | 0.06 | 1040.5 | 1014.9 | 3.31 | 63.21% | 1 + 11.5 |
1957 | Charrington | Punch Stout | 30 | 0.04 | 1047.2 | 1017.4 | 3.85 | 63.14% | 270 |
1959 | Flowers | Table Stout | 30 | 1043.3 | 1016 | 3.53 | 63.05% | 250 | |
1952 | Hope & Anchor | Jubilee Stout | 26 | 0.05 | 1040.6 | 1015.1 | 3.29 | 62.81% | 1 + 10 |
1950 | Hope & Anchor | Jubilee Stout | 26 | 0.05 | 1040 | 1014.9 | 3.24 | 62.75% | 1 + 11 |
1952 | Groves & Whitnall | Red Rose Stout | 26 | 0.07 | 1047.9 | 1017.9 | 3.87 | 62.63% | 1 + 12 |
1951 | Truman | Best Stout | 22 | 0.06 | 1040.9 | 1015.3 | 3.31 | 62.59% | 1 + 16 |
1951 | Hammerton | Oatmeal Stout | 23 | 0.07 | 1046.8 | 1017.6 | 3.77 | 62.39% | 1 + 22 |
1950 | M???? Manchester | Stout | 24 | 0.06 | 1044.1 | 1016.6 | 3.55 | 62.36% | 1 + 13 |
1951 | Greenalls | Oatmeal Stout | 21 | 0.05 | 1042.7 | 1016.1 | 3.43 | 62.30% | |
1950 | H???? Manchester | M. Stout (HMS) | 25 | 0.06 | 1047.2 | 1017.8 | 3.80 | 62.29% | 1 + 14 |
1954 | Plymouth Breweries | Brown Imperial Stout | 25 | 0.04 | 1048.6 | 1018.5 | 3.89 | 61.93% | 375 |
1952 | Atkinsons | Punch Stout | 24 | 0.05 | 1045.3 | 1017.3 | 3.61 | 61.81% | 1R + 11B |
1959 | Joule | Royal Stout | 28 | 1047.1 | 1018 | 3.76 | 61.78% | 250 | |
1959 | Wrekin | MS Stout | 28 | 1042.3 | 1016.2 | 3.37 | 61.70% | 250 | |
1953 | Georges | Glucose Stout | 28 | 0.06 | 1045.5 | 1017.6 | 3.60 | 61.32% | 1 + 11 |
1959 | Whitbread | Mackeson Stout | 32 | 1046 | 1017.8 | 3.64 | 61.30% | 400 | |
1954 | Calder | Scotch Stout | 28 | 0.04 | 1040.9 | 1015.9 | 3.23 | 61.12% | 1 + 14 |
1959 | Boddingtons | Extra Stout | 24 | 1043.8 | 1017.1 | 3.45 | 60.96% | 325 | |
1953 | Charrington | Punch Stout | 30 | 0.05 | 1047.8 | 1018.7 | 3.76 | 60.88% | 1 + 15 |
1956 | Deuchar R | Edinburgh Sweet Stout | 30 | 0.04 | 1042.9 | 1016.8 | 3.37 | 60.84% | 300 |
1954 | Wilsons | Wembly Extra Stout | 26 | 0.04 | 1044.3 | 1017.4 | 3.47 | 60.72% | 325 |
1953 | John Joule | Royal Stout | 28 | 0.05 | 1046.3 | 1018.2 | 3.63 | 60.69% | 1 + 16 |
1953 | Camerons | Sovereign Stout | 28 | 0.06 | 1047.3 | 1018.6 | 3.70 | 60.68% | 1 + 15 |
1959 | Butler, Wm | Black Satin Sweet Stout | 29 | 1042.2 | 1016.6 | 3.30 | 60.66% | 300 | |
1959 | Groves & Whitnall | Red Roses Stout | 25 | 1047.5 | 1018.7 | 3.72 | 60.63% | 250 | |
1954 | Whitworth Son & Nephew | Sweet Stout | 28 | 0.04 | 1044.7 | 1017.6 | 3.50 | 60.63% | 375 |
1954 | Plymouth Breweries | Oatmeal Stout | 25 | 0.04 | 1048.7 | 1019.2 | 3.81 | 60.57% | 400 |
1959 | Taylor Walker | Cannon Stout | 29 | 0.04 | 1045.8 | 1018.1 | 3.57 | 60.48% | 425 |
1952 | Wilsons | Extra Stout | 23 | 0.05 | 1043.7 | 1017.4 | 3.39 | 60.18% | 1R + 16B |
1954 | Truman | Best Stout | 24 | 0.04 | 1044 | 1017.6 | 3.41 | 60.00% | 1 + 10 |
Average | 26.54 | 0.05 | 1044.7 | 1016.8 | 3.60 | 62.46% | |||
Source: | |||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002. |
Is there any indication how oyster-y those oyster stouts were? I've read a little bit suggesting whole oysters were used by then, but I'm fairly suspicious that was a regular practice, and I know it may well have been just a marketing term, sort of like Nut Browns didn't have any nuts in them.
ReplyDelete