Winder what happened to Charrington's Burton brewery? Well it was sold:
"Charrington's Brewery, Burton on-Trent, withdrawn the firm's recent sale at Birmingham at £30,000, has been purchased Messrs. H. Ellis and F. A. Bailey, Burton-on-Trent."But what happened to it after that?
Derby Daily Telegraph - Tuesday 23 February 1926, page 4.
"THE PLACE TO SPEND A MERRY XMAS.GRAND OPENING NIGHT.BOXING DAY, December 26.Door open at 7. Commence at 7.30.At the CHARRINGTON OLD BREWERY, LICHFIELD ST., BURTON.10 ROUNDS CONTEST.JOCK RODGERS (Burton) V. STOKER BOB WILLIAMS.8 ROUNDS CONTEST.BATTLING ALF BARKS (Burton). v. VIC PARKER (Woodville).6 ROUNDS.Extra Special Paper-weight Contest.NIPPER DAN DRAPER V. LEN SMITH (both of Burton).8 ROUNDS.FRED NAYLOR (Derby). V. ARTHUR REED (Swadlincote).
PRICES OF ADMISSION: Ringside 1/2, including tax. Main Hall 6d.
Referee: Mr. BILLY JORDAN. Jun.
Timekeeper: Mr. Jordan, Sen.
Promoters: C. Birch and B. Sherratt."
Derby Daily Telegraph - Saturday 21 December 1929, page 16.
There was no chance it would have been used for brewing again. It seems have turned into some sort of hall. I wonder which bit of the brewery it was? Some large room, obviously.
This is quite strong for a 8d Ordinary Bitter, with some of the samples around 1050ยบ. It's another pretty highly attenuated beer.
Charrington, you may recall, had a shite Mild (14th of 17) but a fairly decent Burton (5th of 14). Let's see how their Bitter does.
Charrington Pale Ale quality 1922 - 1925 | |||||||||
Year | Style | FG | OG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Appearance | Flavour | score | Price |
1922 | PA | 1006.3 | 1045.8 | 5.16 | 86.24% | grey | poor | -1 | 8d |
1922 | PA | 1008.2 | 1047.4 | 5.11 | 82.70% | bright | rather poor | -1 | 8d |
1922 | PA | 1009 | 1049.5 | 5.28 | 81.82% | grey | v fair | 2 | 8d |
1922 | PA | 1010.8 | 1048.3 | 4.88 | 77.64% | cloudy | not quite nice | -1 | 8d |
1923 | PA | 1009.2 | 1047.7 | 5.01 | 80.71% | hazy | mawkish | -1 | 8d |
1923 | PA | 1008.6 | 1048.6 | 5.21 | 82.30% | piecy | fair | 1 | 8d |
1923 | PA | 1008 | 1049.5 | 5.42 | 83.84% | not bright | gone off | -3 | 8d |
1923 | PA | 1010 | 1047.5 | 4.88 | 78.95% | brilliant | v fair | 2 | 8d |
1923 | PA | 1007.2 | 1046.2 | 5.09 | 84.42% | not bright | gone off | -3 | 7d |
1923 | PA | 1010.6 | 1048.1 | 4.88 | 77.96% | grey | v fair | 2 | 7d |
1925 | PA | 1008 | 1051.5 | 5.68 | 84.47% | bright | good | 2 | 7d |
Average | 1008.7 | 1048.2 | 5.14 | 81.91% | -0.09 | ||||
Source: | |||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001 |
Oh dear. Only three of eleven bright. That's woeful. Fewer than 50% with a positive score, just five, including two -3. But the four pretty good ones with scores of +2 almost balance that out. Almost, because is a small negative, -0.09.
Another gamble. Could be heaven or could be hell.
I do like the phrase, 'Not quite nice'.
ReplyDeleteI think that I'll try and find an excuse to use it in the near future.