Here we have the 1945 Bitter to pair with the 1945 Mild. Brew both and you could serve 1945 Tetley's Mixed. I bet people did genuinely do that in pubs. I can remember mixed being fairly popular in Leeds in the 1970's.
A couple of things immediately strike me about this beer. First is the gravity. 1042º is very respectable for an Ordinary Bitter of the period. I haven't a huge number of Bitters from this date, just 15. They have an average OG of 1037.7. And at least one - Barclay Perkins PA - was a Best Bitter. That was just 1038º. The strongest, Courage PA, was 1043.7º.
That tells me something. Tetley must have sold a lot more Mild than Bitter. How do I know that? Because there was a cap on the average OG of all beer produced in a brewery. And that average was well below 1042º. I don't know the figure it was set at in 1945, but as the average OG of all beer brewed that year was 1034.54º*, it must have been around 1035º.
The second point is the degree of attenuation, which is very high. Which means it has a very high ABV of 5.25%. How typical was that? Post-war, every example I have was over 80%. Take a look:
Tetley's Bitter 1928 - 1989 | |||||||||
Year | Beer | Price | size | package | FG | OG | colour | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
1928 | Bitter Ale | 9d | pint | bottled | 1014.4 | 1049.6 | 4.56 | 70.97% | |
1940 | Pale Ale | 9d | pint | draught | 1045.6 | ||||
1952 | Pale Ale | 16d | pint | draught | 1036.3 | 20 | |||
1953 | Pale Ale | 16d | pint | draught | 1037.3 | 20 | |||
1955 | Bitter | 12.5d | half | bottled | 1004 | 1037.1 | 23 | 4.32 | 89.22% |
1959 | Bitter Ale | 10.5d | half | bottled | 1006.1 | 1039 | 23 | 4.11 | 84.36% |
1960 | Bitter | 16d | pint | draught | 1003.7 | 1037.9 | 20 | 4.28 | 90.24% |
1964 | Bitter Ale | 12.5d | half | bottled | 1005.6 | 1040 | 25 | 4.30 | 86.00% |
1977 | Bitter | pint | draught | 1035.5 | |||||
1979 | Bitter | pint | draught | 1035.5 | |||||
1981 | Bitter | pint | draught | 1035.5 | |||||
1982 | Bitter | pint | draught | 1035.5 | |||||
1986 | Bitter | pint | draught | 1035.5 | |||||
1989 | Bitter | pint | draught | 1035 | |||||
Sources: | |||||||||
Truman Gravity Book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/252 | |||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001 | |||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002 |
You can see that the OG fell below 1040º in the 1950's, rose a little in the 1960's, then settled in the mid 1030's.
How did Tetley's compare with other Bitters? Why don't we take a look:
Bitter in 1945 | |||||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | Price per pint (pence) | package | FG | OG | colour | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
1945 | Barclay Perkins | PA | 14 | draught | 1009.3 | 1038 | 32.5 | 3.72 | 75.53% |
1945 | Barclay Perkins | XLK | draught | 1012.25 | 1035.4 | 29 | 2.99 | 65.40% | |
1945 | Charrington | P.A. | 14 | draught | 1009.4 | 1037 | 18.5 | 3.58 | 74.59% |
1945 | Courage | PA | 16 | draught | 1010.4 | 1043.7 | 22 | 4.33 | 76.20% |
1945 | Lees | B | 1038.0 | ||||||
1945 | Lees | B | 1038.0 | ||||||
1945 | Mann | PA | 16 | draught | 1010.1 | 1042.5 | 27 | 4.21 | 76.24% |
1945 | Meux | PA | 14 | draught | 1007.4 | 1032.1 | 21 | 3.20 | 76.95% |
1945 | Meux | PA | 14 | draught | 1006.4 | 1032.8 | 21 | 3.43 | 80.49% |
1945 | Taylor Walker | PA | 14 | draught | 1011.2 | 1037 | 29 | 3.34 | 69.73% |
1945 | Truman | PA | 15 | draught | 1005.9 | 1041.6 | 24 | 4.65 | 85.82% |
1945 | Watney | PA | 14 | draught | 1006.6 | 1038.3 | 27 | 4.12 | 82.77% |
1945 | Whitbread | PA | 14 | draught | 1009.2 | 1032.8 | 27.5 | 3.06 | 71.95% |
1945 | Whitbread | PA | 1010.0 | 1039.4 | 26 | 3.89 | 74.62% | ||
1945 | Whitbread | PA | 1012.5 | 1039.5 | 26 | 3.57 | 68.35% | ||
Average | 14.5 | 1009.28 | 1037.74 | 24.5 | 3.70 | 75.28% | |||
Sources: | |||||||||
Barclay Perkins brewing record held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number ACC/2305/01/626. | |||||||||
Lees brewing recods | |||||||||
Whitbread brewing record held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/01/112. | |||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002 |
Tetley's Bitter had a higher OG, greater degree of attenuation and a paler colour than the average. Only one of the other Bitters comes even close in terms of attenuation - Truman PA. Tetley's look pretty atypical, though it should be borne in mind that all the others, with the exception of Lees, were London beers.
Almost forgot the flaked barley. That was a hangover from the war, when the government forced brewers to use it to save the energy used in malting.
I'm all out of crap to tell you, so it's over to Kristen . . . . . . . .
Kristen’s Version:
Notes: Yeah…Tetley’s mild. One of my very favorite ‘drink-theer-piss-outta-eers’. You want to know what invert No2 tastes like, make this. You want to test your metal as a brewer, make this. You want to make a beer that can be done in two weeks, make this. You want me to stop writing, ma…err…yeah…
Malt: The original had a blend of 3 different English pale malts of 29%, 29% and 8%. Choose a blend or just do one. Whatever you fancy. A decent 14% of the doughy flaked barley and then lots of Invert and a touch of caramel which we’ve discussed previously….and can be left out all together.
Invert No2. http://www.unholymess.com/blog/beer-brewing-info/making-brewers-invert
Caramel. http://www.unholymess.com/blog/beer-brewing-info/making-brewers-caramel
Hops: Not hugely hoppy but not nothing either. A decent hop presence so choose whatever you like. Really this time. Go bonkers. Maybe some nice Hallertauer Blanc? Me, I’m using some Brewers Gold, b/c that’s how I feel today, in a golden mood. Goldings of any sort will work just peachy.
Yeast: (Same as before) Any really gang. This bastard is dry as a bone so pick your favorite one that you know how to use. Over pitch. Over oxygenate. Hope and pry she dries out for you.
Sundries: Nothing specific. Make it dry. Use the right sugar. Don’t forget to forget the bleedin caramel.
Cask: Standard procedure:
1) let the beer ferment until finished and then give it another day or so. For me right around 5-7 days.
2) Rack the beer to your vessel of choice (firkin, polypin, cornie, whatever).
3) Add primings at ~3.5g/L
4) Add prepared isinglass at 1ml/L
5) ONLY add dry hops at 0.25g/l – 1g/L.
6) Bung it up and roll it around to mix. Condition at 55F or so for 4-5 days and its ready to go. Spile/vent. Tap. Settle. Serve at 55F.
* Brewers' Almanack 1955, p. 50.
Ron,
ReplyDeleteI finally got my copy of your book last week and I love it. But there is one thing that really stands out when comparing the recipes in the book to the Let's Brew recipes and that is the almost complete lack of dry hopping information in the book. Only one recipe in the book (1939 Barclay Perkins IPA) has dry hopping, whereas in Let's Brew there are dry hop amounts in many of the recipes.
You do mention in the section on hops that brewing records contain very little info on the hop additions and that your hopping schemes are based on descriptions from brewing manuals and you have to make an educated guess. So I assume Kristen is making an educated guess in the Let's Brew recipes rather than basing this on what is in the brewing logs?
Either way, can you give us some broad style guidelines on dry hopping? And I'm guessing this also changed over time, just like every other aspect of brewing.
Looking forward to the book signing in Boston in March. I have a 1901 Albany XX Ale I'd like to share with you.
Brian,
ReplyDeletea couple of the breweries list the dry hops, but they are definitely in the minority. Barclay Perkins are one that does.
As a rule, 4 to 8 oz per barrel for Pale Ales, 8 to 16 oz for Stock Ales, 8 to 16 oz for Stout. If you divide those amounts by 7 you get the right quantity for the recipes, which are 6 US gallons.
Kristen, these seem to be the notes for their mild; do you have a different set for the bitters?
ReplyDeleteDave Moon,
ReplyDeleteSorry. Somehow I cocked it up. I simply said that there is nothing fancy about this beer other than the very low FG.
Kristen
I've made this recipe many times and it is just delicious. The somewhat 'variable' factor is the liquid invert sugar, which always comes out slightly different depending on when I pull it off the stove, but that just adds something to the flavour.
ReplyDeleteHow much of the caramel would you have to add? It says "caramel to add" but what does the 1 srm mean? Is that a weight or the colour?
ReplyDeleteBrianB,
ReplyDeleteenough caramel to increase the colour by 1 SRM. The quantity will depend on the colour of your caramel.
Ah thanks. I wondered if it might be something like that. So I guess the caramel is more for the colour than flavour, and the invert sugar syrup might make more of a difference to the flavour?
ReplyDeleteBrian B,
ReplyDeleteyes. Not much flavour from the small amount of caramel. Plenty from the sugar.
Brewed this last week with a blend of Baird's Pale and Mild malt, flaked barley, Lyle's with molasses and EKG. Tossed on a fresh smack pack of 1469.
ReplyDeleteGot 1035 OG which was about what I was shooting for and ended up at 1001. 4.3%
Dry as a bone as Kristen says!
Took a reading tonight and will keg this weekend.
As usual the small sample I had was tasty!
I really dig these historical recipes, thanks Ron for all the work you do and giving us the oppurtunity to brew these beers!