But to start off I thought I'd summarise the vital statistics of the London Milds we've been looking at. I've averaged out the values for each of the beers. I think you'll agree that they give us some fascinating insights. No? OK, they tell us one thing. London brewers kept a very close eye on each other.
Why do I say that? Because the OG's of Milds in the same class are all very close to each other. I've used the price per pint in 1922 to divide them up: 5d, 6d and 7d. The three 5d Milds have a variation of less than 1 point. If you leave out Watney, the spread across the 7d Milds is exactly 1 point. There's slightly more variation in the 6d Milds - 2.4 points altogether, but the majority are 1034-1035ยบ.
Attenuation is in the high 70's or low 80's for the vast majority of the Milds. Only Hoare X and Truman X were significantly lower.
Here's all the information in handy table form:
Average values for London Mild Ales in the 1920's | ||||||
Brewery | Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Price per pint |
Meux | MA | 1028.1 | 1005.9 | 2.88 | 78.93% | 5d |
Whitbread | MA | 1028.7 | 1005.1 | 3.06 | 82.04% | 5d |
Truman | MA | 1029.0 | 1007.5 | 2.79 | 74.31% | 5d |
City of London | X | 1033.7 | 1006.4 | 3.55 | 81.04% | 6d |
Hoare | X | 1033.8 | 1009.8 | 3.11 | 71.16% | 6d |
Courage | X | 1034.5 | 1007.3 | 3.53 | 78.76% | 6d |
Wenlock | X | 1034.6 | 1007.2 | 3.57 | 79.21% | 6d |
Cannon | X | 1035.1 | 1008.1 | 3.53 | 77.11% | 6d |
Huggins | X | 1036.0 | 1008.1 | 3.63 | 77.57% | 6d |
Charrington | X | 1040.8 | 1008.7 | 4.17 | 78.63% | 7d |
Lion Brewery | X | 1040.9 | 1007.6 | 4.33 | 81.37% | 7d |
Meux | X | 1041.2 | 1008.2 | 4.28 | 80.02% | 7d |
Truman | X | 1041.2 | 1011.8 | 3.82 | 71.44% | 7d |
Whitbread | X | 1041.2 | 1007.6 | 4.38 | 81.62% | 7d |
Mann | X | 1041.3 | 1008.2 | 4.26 | 79.96% | 7d |
Barclay Perkins | X | 1041.8 | 1010.7 | 4.01 | 74.38% | 7d |
Watney | X | 1043.6 | 1008.8 | 4.50 | 79.65% | 7d |
Sources: | ||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001. |
Let's get on with what I'm sure you've all been waiting for, the London Mild Premier League Table for 1925. It's a bit surprising for anyone who started their drinking in the 1970's, like I did:
League table of London Milds in the 1920's by score | |||||||
Brewery | Beer | No. examples | no. bright | % bright | no. good flavour | % good flavour | average score |
City of London | X | 12 | 4 | 33.33% | 3 | 25.00% | -1.25 |
Charrington | X | 10 | 3 | 30.00% | 5 | 50.00% | -0.70 |
Barclay Perkins | X | 14 | 1 | 7.14% | 5 | 35.71% | -0.64 |
Truman | MA | 8 | 4 | 50.00% | 2 | 25.00% | -0.63 |
Meux | MA | 7 | 4 | 57.14% | 2 | 28.57% | -0.57 |
Whitbread | X | 5 | 3 | 60.00% | 2 | 40.00% | -0.2 |
Meux | X | 11 | 6 | 54.55% | 6 | 54.55% | 0 |
Huggins | X | 10 | 6 | 60.00% | 7 | 70.00% | 0.20 |
Hoare | X | 10 | 7 | 70.00% | 7 | 70.00% | 0.30 |
Courage | X | 16 | 15 | 93.75% | 11 | 68.75% | 0.38 |
Lion Brewery | X | 10 | 5 | 50.00% | 6 | 60.00% | 0.40 |
Truman | X | 14 | 11 | 78.57% | 9 | 64.29% | 0.5 |
Cannon | X | 14 | 9 | 64.29% | 9 | 64.29% | 0.54 |
Whitbread | MA | 3 | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 66.67% | 0.67 |
Wenlock | X | 12 | 8 | 66.67% | 10 | 83.33% | 1.17 |
Watney | X | 17 | 16 | 94.12% | 15 | 88.24% | 1.25 |
Mann | X | 15 | 10 | 66.67% | 11 | 73.33% | 1.33 |
Source: | |||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001 |
Yes, it's true: Watney and Mann (in my young days combined into one evil conglomerate) come out on top. As they were two of the beers for which there were the most samples, I don't think it's a freak result. Just shows how dangerous it is to project the future into the past. That their beer was shit in the 1970's tells you nothing about its quality pre-war.
Wenlock is a surprising third with a very respectable score. Whitbread MA at number four is even more surprising, but that is based on just three samples. The X Ales of Huggins, Hoare, Courage, Lion Brewery, Truman and Cannon all come out with modestly positive scores.
It was saddening to see so many of the great Porter breweries with negative scores - City of London, Charrington, Truman, Meux, Whitbread and my own favourite Barclay Perkins. The one other brewery with a negative score was Charrington, one of London's most renowned Ale brewers. All very odd.
One last table. These are the beers rated by clarity:
League table of London Milds in the 1920's by clarity | |||||||
Brewery | Beer | No. examples | no. bright | % bright | no. good flavour | % good flavour | average score |
Whitbread | MA | 3 | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 66.67% | 0.67 |
Barclay Perkins | X | 14 | 1 | 7.14% | 5 | 35.71% | -0.64 |
Charrington | X | 10 | 3 | 30.00% | 5 | 50.00% | -0.70 |
City of London | X | 12 | 4 | 33.33% | 3 | 25.00% | -1.25 |
Truman | MA | 8 | 4 | 50.00% | 2 | 25.00% | -0.63 |
Lion Brewery | X | 10 | 5 | 50.00% | 6 | 60.00% | 0.40 |
Meux | X | 11 | 6 | 54.55% | 6 | 54.55% | 0 |
Meux | MA | 7 | 4 | 57.14% | 2 | 28.57% | -0.57 |
Whitbread | X | 5 | 3 | 60.00% | 2 | 40.00% | -0.2 |
Huggins | X | 10 | 6 | 60.00% | 7 | 70.00% | 0.20 |
Cannon | X | 14 | 9 | 64.29% | 9 | 64.29% | 0.54 |
Wenlock | X | 12 | 8 | 66.67% | 10 | 83.33% | 1.17 |
Mann | X | 15 | 10 | 66.67% | 11 | 73.33% | 1.33 |
Hoare | X | 10 | 7 | 70.00% | 7 | 70.00% | 0.30 |
Truman | X | 14 | 11 | 78.57% | 9 | 64.29% | 0.5 |
Courage | X | 16 | 15 | 93.75% | 11 | 68.75% | 0.38 |
Watney | X | 17 | 16 | 94.12% | 15 | 88.24% | 1.25 |
Source: | |||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001. |
Slightly different results, but Watney still does very well.
Just wondering, did you come across Michell & Aldous in Kilburn (taken over by Trumans c1920)while wandering around London at that time. Kilburn was my early stamping ground, many Truman pubs.
ReplyDeleteDyranian,
ReplyDeletethey aren't mentioned in the Whitbread Gravity Book. Probably too small to have caught Whitbread's attention.
Was Red Barrel any worse than the keg bitters of today?
ReplyDeleteTom,
ReplyDeleteI never tried Red Barrel so I've no idea. From what people said at the time it seems to have been pretty bad.
Could you argue that the fact Watney's beer was good back then paved the way for them to become dominant in the 1960s and 70s? If it had been shite, they'd never have got to the point where they had enough cash to buy everyone else out.
ReplyDeleteHere's an interesting thing on the quality of Red Barrel unearthed by Ed Wray. We really want someone to brew a clone so we can try it out of morbid curiosity.