In the period covered by this table, world hop production was dominated by four regions: the German Empire, Bohemia, the UK and America (not sure if it's just the USA of if Canada is also included). As the second table makes more clear, between 80% and 90% of the world's hops were produced in these regions. ANd in the German Empire, more than 50% of the hops were grown in Bavaria.
I'm going to have to dig out my Brauwelt Breviers and Statistical Handbooks because I'm sure they have recent figures on hop production. I'm pretty sure that the overall picture is similar but for one thing: the UK's share. While Bohemia, Bavaria and the USA remain major players in hop growing, the British industry has seen a steep decline in the last couple of decades. I really should dig out the numbers to show just how catastrophic a collapse there's been.
World hop production 1896 - 1909 | ||||||||||||||||
Country | Area of production (hectares) | Estimated production (thousands of 50 kg) | ||||||||||||||
1908 | 1909 | 1896 | 1897 | 1898 | 1899 | 1900 | 1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1905 | 1906 | 1907 | 1908 | 1909 | |
Bavaria | 22,952 | 18,634 | 275 | 208 | 262 | 298 | 225 | 110 | 272 | 260 | 239 | 325 | 250 | 263 | 307 | 86 |
Württemberg | 4,967 | 3,783 | 73 | 67 | 69 | 107 | 78 | 54 | 68 | 66 | 70 | 87 | 52 | 61 | 68 | 12 |
Baden | 1,664 | 1,308 | 48 | 34 | 30 | 48 | 29 | 25 | 35 | 28 | 35 | 38 | 31 | 29 | 35 | 2 |
Alsace-Lorraine | 4,564 | 4,131 | 85 | 75 | 63 | 83 | 77 | 55 | 65 | 70 | 79 | 125 | 72 | 95 | 104 | 12 |
Prussia and the rest of Germany | 1,684 | 1,108 | 29 | 29 | 12 | 45 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 19 | 32 | 17 | 22 | 22 | 7 |
German Empire | 35,831 | 28,964 | 510 | 473 | 436 | 581 | 433 | 269 | 466 | 449 | 442 | 607 | 422 | 470 | 536 | 119 |
France | 3,030 | 2,800 | 63 | 72 | 61 | 79 | 72 | 64 | 50 | 57 | 51 | 71 | 75 | 79 | 80 | 27 |
Bohemia | 17,280 | 15,420 | 185 | 117 | 150 | 195 | 155 | 282 | 133 | 65 | 128 | 293 | 103 | 236 | 284 | 104 |
Oberösterreich | 849 | 849 | 7 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Styria | 4,395 | 3,252 | 25 | 22 | ||||||||||||
Galicia | 2,585 | 2,548 | 45 | 45 | 36 | 59 | 58 | 64 | 51 | 48 | 52 | 68 | 71 | 82 | 18 | 14 |
Moravia, Karinthia | 607 | 512 | 10 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Hungary, Transylvania | 1,154 | 1,154 | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Belgium and Holland | 2,341 | 1,922 | 88 | 70 | 25 | 103 | 52 | 80 | 65 | 83 | 103 | 107 | 45 | 55 | 78 | 29 |
Russia and other districts | 10,160 | 8,412 | 128 | 120 | 64 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 55 | 80 | 75 | 60 |
Continental Europe | 78,232 | 65,833 | 1019 | 897 | 772 | 1097 | 850 | 839 | 825 | 712 | 816 | 1246 | 771 | 1002 | 1128 | 399 |
UK | 15,762 | 13,179 | 453 | 417 | 302 | 661 | 353 | 640 | 311 | 480 | 290 | 707 | 249 | 380 | 475 | 205 |
Europe | 93,994 | 79,012 | 1472 | 1314 | 1134 | 1758 | 1203 | 1479 | 1136 | 1142 | 1106 | 1053 | 1020 | 1382 | 1603 | 604 |
America | 20,251 | 17,659 | 309 | 344 | 339 | 380 | 329 | 332 | 360 | 402 | 435 | 504 | 571 | 520 | 410 | 310 |
Australia | 861 | 750 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 10 |
World | 115,106 | 97,421 | 1795 | 1673 | 1486 | 2153 | 1548 | 1826 | 1511 | 1558 | 1555 | 2472 | 1606 | 1916 | 2027 | 924 |
Source: | ||||||||||||||||
Barth Report 1910 | ||||||||||||||||
http://www.barthhaasgroup.com/images/pdfs/Lupulo%201909-1910.pdf |
World hop production 1896 - 1909 in % share | ||||||||||||||
1896 | 1897 | 1898 | 1899 | 1900 | 1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1905 | 1906 | 1907 | 1908 | 1909 | |
Bavaria | 15.32% | 12.43% | 17.63% | 13.84% | 14.53% | 6.02% | 18.00% | 16.69% | 15.37% | 13.15% | 15.57% | 13.73% | 15.15% | 9.31% |
German Empire | 28.41% | 28.27% | 29.34% | 26.99% | 27.97% | 14.73% | 30.84% | 28.82% | 28.42% | 24.56% | 26.28% | 24.53% | 26.44% | 12.88% |
Bohemia | 10.31% | 6.99% | 10.09% | 9.06% | 10.01% | 15.44% | 8.80% | 4.17% | 8.23% | 11.85% | 6.41% | 12.32% | 14.01% | 11.26% |
UK | 25.24% | 24.93% | 20.32% | 30.70% | 22.80% | 35.05% | 20.58% | 30.81% | 18.65% | 28.60% | 15.50% | 19.83% | 23.43% | 22.19% |
America | 17.21% | 20.56% | 22.81% | 17.65% | 21.25% | 18.18% | 23.83% | 25.80% | 27.97% | 20.39% | 35.55% | 27.14% | 20.23% | 33.55% |
total | 81.17% | 80.75% | 82.57% | 84.39% | 82.04% | 83.41% | 84.05% | 89.60% | 83.28% | 85.40% | 83.75% | 83.82% | 84.11% | 79.87% |
Source: | ||||||||||||||
Barth Report 1910 | ||||||||||||||
http://www.barthhaasgroup.com/images/pdfs/Lupulo%201909-1910.pdf |
The numbers also show the volataility in hop production, with large differences from year to year. In the best year in this set, 1905, output was almost 2.5 times that of the worst year, 1909. You have to suspect something climatic, as the poor harvest seems to only apply to Europe in that year.
Hang on, I do have the 1953 numbers to hand. Let's compare 1908 and 1953. Should be fun. (I'm using 1908 because 1909 was a particularly poor year in Europe.)
Hop production 1909 - 1953 (kg) | ||||
Country | 1908 | % | 1953 | % |
USA | 20,500,000 | 20.23% | 18,938,426 | 31.52% |
United Kingdom | 23,750,000 | 23.43% | 13,513,440 | 22.49% |
Czechoslovakia | 14,200,000 | 14.01% | 4,999,973 | 8.32% |
Germany | 26,800,000 | 26.44% | 14,250,075 | 23.72% |
France | 4,000,000 | 3.95% | 2,449,844 | 4.08% |
Belgium | 3,900,000 | 3.85% | 974,339 | 1.62% |
Australia | 700,000 | 0.69% | 1,422,467 | 2.37% |
World Total | 101,350,000 | 60,081,618 | ||
Sources: | ||||
Barth Report 1910 | ||||
1955 Brewers' Almanack, page 65. |
You can see that hop production fell everywhere except Australia. The UK's share of world production stayed much the same, at around 23%. Germany's share fell a little and the USA's increased a little. But the four largest producers are exactly the same as in 1908. Why had hop production fallen? Because demand for hops had, particluarly in the UK. The drop in beer gravity and the move to less hoppy beer caused a huge fall in the quantity of hops required. It must have had a big impact on the world market, as the UK had been using a considerable proportion of the world's hops.
Is there an argument that after WWII the effects of the wartime Ministry of Food's control of land use was still being felt, that hop fields were converted to other foods when needed and that imposed change continued due to being more profitable or just less costly than the expense of reinstating hop production?
ReplyDeleteAlan,
ReplyDeleteUK hop production in 1945 was the same as in 1939. Though the acres growing hops increased slightly over the same period. Between 1945 and 1952 the area growing hops rose from 20,000 acres to 22,000.
I think overall it makes sense, since later 1800's more present-use beer (of all kinds including lager), more refrigeration, better stability through yeast selection and sterile controls, therefore less hops needed or less than there might have been when overall population increase is factored (not sure of effect of WW II) here.
ReplyDeleteGary
2010:
ReplyDeleteGermany 34,249 metric tonnes
USA 23,701
China 10,000
Czech 7,800
Poland 2,593
Slovenia 2,073
North Korea 1,900
UK 1,500
From wikipedia and I couldnt figure out their source, so take with a grain of salt or a gose.