It seems one of the Youngers, William J. Younger to be precise, did a bit of work experience in Burton. He kept his own personal, handwritten brewing book. Which he took back with him to Scotland. It wasn't that unusual for brewers to keep their own private records in parallel with the official brewing books. I've come across a few of them in the archives.
Evershed used a typically Burton system for naming their beers. Ales numbered 1 to 7, Stouts P4 and P5 and the enigmatic O. It had me confused for a while. A long while. Until about half an hour ago, in fact. A beer of 1060 with 5 or 6 pounds of hops per barrel. Then I twigged. That must be the Pale Ale.
Evershed beers 1891 - 1892 | ||||||||||||
Date | Year | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Attenuation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl | boil time (hours) | boil time (hours) | Pitch temp |
2nd Feb | 1892 | 1 | Ale | 1098.34 | 1049.86 | 6.41 | 49.30% | 11.82 | 4 | 4.25 | º | |
29th Jan | 1892 | 2 | Ale | 1080.33 | 1035.32 | 5.95 | 56.03% | 10.00 | 3.45 | 2.5 | 3 | º |
29th Jan | 1892 | 3 | Ale | 1073.96 | 1030.47 | 5.75 | 58.80% | 10.00 | 3.18 | 2.5 | 3 | º |
15th Jan | 1892 | 3 | Ale | 1075.07 | 1025.62 | 6.54 | 65.87% | 20.00 | 7.23 | 2.5 | 56º | |
14th Dec | 1891 | 4 | Ale | 1065.37 | 1024.93 | 5.35 | 61.86% | 18.33 | 5.12 | 2.5 | 3.75 | 57º |
18th Jan | 1892 | 4 | Ale | 1065.93 | 1024.93 | 5.42 | 62.18% | 9.17 | 5.21 | 2.5 | º | |
1st Feb | 1892 | 4 | Ale | 1067.31 | 1026.32 | 5.42 | 60.91% | 9.17 | 5.27 | 2.5 | 3.5 | º |
8th Feb | 1892 | 4 | Ale | 1066.48 | 1024.93 | 5.50 | 62.50% | 9.17 | 5.21 | 2.5 | 3.5 | º |
14th Dec | 1891 | 5 | Ale | 1057.89 | 1023.55 | 4.54 | 59.33% | 17.27 | 3.94 | 2.5 | 3.25 | 58º |
15th Dec | 1891 | 5 | Ale | 1061.49 | 1024.24 | 4.93 | 60.59% | 20.47 | 5.18 | 2.5 | 3.25 | 58º |
15th Jan | 1892 | 5 | Ale | 1060.39 | 1022.16 | 5.06 | 63.30% | 15.81 | 4.05 | 2.5 | 3.25 | 58º |
1st Feb | 1892 | 5 | Ale | 1057.89 | 1020.78 | 4.91 | 64.11% | 8.64 | 3.92 | 2.5 | 3.5 | º |
5th Feb | 1892 | 5 | Ale | 1058.17 | 1021.47 | 4.86 | 63.10% | 7.91 | 3.98 | 2.5 | 3.25 | º |
14th Dec | 1891 | 6 | Ale | 1052.91 | 1020.08 | 4.34 | 62.04% | 15.79 | 3.61 | 2.5 | 3.25 | 58º |
16th Dec | 1891 | 6 | Ale | 1052.35 | 1020.08 | 4.27 | 61.64% | 15.79 | 3.51 | 2.5 | 3.25 | 58º |
13th Jan | 1892 | 6 | Ale | 1053.74 | 1019.39 | 4.54 | 63.92% | 17.44 | 3.54 | 2.5 | 3.25 | 58º |
3rd Feb | 1892 | 6 | Ale | 1054.29 | 1020.08 | 4.53 | 63.01% | 8.29 | 3.54 | 2.5 | 3 | º |
5th Feb | 1892 | 6 | Ale | 1051.80 | 1019.39 | 4.29 | 62.57% | 7.89 | 3.49 | 2.5 | 3.75 | º |
29th Jan | 1892 | 7 | Ale | 1044.32 | 1017.31 | 3.57 | 60.94% | 17.93 | 3.06 | 2.5 | 3.25 | 59º |
2nd Feb | 1892 | Beer | Table Beer | 1020.78 | 4 | 4.25 | º | |||||
15th Mar | 1892 | K3 | Ale | 1073.68 | 1025.62 | 6.36 | 65.23% | 2.25 | 3 | º | ||
29th Feb | 1892 | K4 | Ale | 1069.25 | 1025.62 | 5.77 | 63.00% | 2.25 | 3 | º | ||
16th Dec | 1891 | O | Pale Ale | 1061.22 | 1020.08 | 5.44 | 67.19% | 17.27 | 4.44 | 2.25 | 3.25 | 57º |
13th Jan | 1892 | O | Pale Ale | 1059.00 | 1020.78 | 5.06 | 64.79% | 26.05 | 6.51 | 2.25 | 3.25 | 56.75º |
18th Jan | 1892 | O | Pale Ale | 1058.72 | 1019.39 | 5.20 | 66.98% | 13.02 | 6.51 | 2.25 | 3.25 | 57º |
1st Feb | 1892 | O | Pale Ale | 1059.83 | 1020.78 | 5.17 | 65.28% | 11.16 | 5.68 | 2.5 | 3.25 | º |
8th Feb | 1892 | O | Pale Ale | 1060.11 | 1019.39 | 5.39 | 67.74% | 13.02 | 6.67 | 2.25 | 3.75 | º |
3rd Feb | 1892 | O4 | Pale Ale | 1055.12 | 1018.70 | 4.82 | 66.08% | 11.28 | 5.15 | 2.5 | 3 | º |
2nd Nov | 1891 | P4 | Stout | 1064.40 | 1027.70 | 4.86 | 56.99% | 3.25 | 58º | |||
18th Mar | 1892 | P4 | Stout | 1067.31 | 1022.85 | 5.88 | 66.05% | 2.75 | 3.5 | º | ||
18th Mar | 1892 | P5 | Stout | 1063.16 | 1025.62 | 4.97 | 59.43% | 2.75 | 3.5 | º | ||
Source: | ||||||||||||
Document WY/6/1/1/14 held at the Scottish Brewing Archive. |
I assume that 5, 6 and 7 were marketed as Mild Burton Ales. 1, 2, 3 and 4 as plain Burton Ales or Strong Burton Ales. While K3 and K4 would be Old Burton Ales.
It's great to have more details of Burton brewing. But it only make me long more for a glance at Bass's brewing records.
Anyone know why the 2 boil times?
ReplyDeleteTwo worts, boiled for a different length of time.
ReplyDeleteThat No.1's attenuation was horrible. 49%? In fact, quite a few of those beers suffered from what appears to be sluggish fermentation. Cold weather then, perhaps?
ReplyDeleteguru, those probably aren't the true final gravities for the strong beers that would have been kept for months before sale.
ReplyDelete