Pages

Thursday 2 December 2010

Fullers XX(K)

I'm now able to tell you of a project I've been working on with Fullers. Now the first beer has officially been released. It's a simple concept: brew recipes from the Fullers brewing books.

It's the main reason I've been in London so often this year. First to discuss, then to brew, a beer from 1891 called XXK. I can now tell everyone I've brewed at Fullers. Yes, I made the mouse click that kicked the whole process off. It made me feel ridiculously happy. Easily pleased, that's me.

John Keeling and Derek Prentice, the people in charge of brewing at Fullers weren't going to do it half-arsed. I doubt John has ever done anything half-arsed in his life. They were keen to replicate as closely as possible the original recipe.And I was only too happy to give whatever help I could.

You're never going to be able to create an exact copy of a beer from the past. Malt and hops are agricultural and not chemical products. They vary from one year to the next, let alone across centuries. Hops are easier to match than malts. Fuggle's and Goldings are still around. Barley varieties change with much greater frequency. Even something like Maris Otter is a fairly recent development.

Luckily, Fullers were able to get hold of some Plumage Archer barley, which they then had malted by Simpson's. The variety dates from 1903. Which is about as close as you're going to get. It was malted in drum maltings, which were being used in 1891.

Fullers brewery has changed a fair bit since 1891. As we discovered on brew day. Back then they' performed what I'd call an underlet mash. That's where half an hour or so in hot water is added from below, raising the temperature. Usually the internal rakes would be used to mix it through the mash. Fullers current mash tuns have no rakes. There was a fair amount of manual fiddling about - including pushing the sparge arm around with a stick - to replicate the original process.

What type of beer is it? I'd call it a Burton. A style that re-invented itself as a dark beer in the 20th century. Old Ale. You could call it that as well, if Burton doesn't appear your style lexicon. Or Strong Ale. The English have always been a bit vague - not to say downright inconsistent - in the naming of stronger beers.

The scary part came on Monday. At the release event. When I had to stand up and explain XX in 5 minutes without heistation, deviation or repetition. As I got to my feet I sent a glass smashing to the floor. At least it got the attention of the various hacks and freeloaders, sorry, invited guests. I hope I didn't confuse them too much with my tale of Pale Mild, Burton and the code of X's.

I like the beer. Pretty colour and lots of flavour. Not bursting with passion fruit or any of that bollocks. My days of writing detailed beer descriptions are over. Why should you trust what I say? Go and try it for yourself.

28 comments:

  1. So what about the last mile? Was this sold bottled? Would there have been a wood or brett element in the K version, or in the draught running version?

    ReplyDelete
  2. When I saw the article in First Draught, I thought I detected the hand of Ron! Will have to attempt to track some of this down.
    Cheers, Mark

    ReplyDelete
  3. It’s a great beer Ron, well done, glad it was only a glass, sitting in the hacks’ bay at the back I thought it a bottle… ;-))

    ReplyDelete
  4. Beer Nut, I've a Fullers price list from 1893. Something called Strong Old Ale looks very much like XXK. It was sold by the barrel. The only bottled beers were Pale Ale and India Pale Ale.

    Which doesn't necessarily mean XXK was never bottled. A lot of bottling was carried out by third parties.

    There probably would have been a brett presence, either from the pitching yeast or the vats.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That is just wonderful. Well done, Ron. If you can leverage me a cross-Atlantic sample or put me in touch with those who can, I would love to try it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ron, you magnificent bastard!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've been looking forward to this for months, can't wait to try it now it's out.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Top work that man! Fingers crossed there are plans to bring some to the States, or they still have some when I make it to the UK.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Duncan from Folkestone2 December 2010 at 06:52

    I must be on the path to becoming a full-on beer bore, as I find this really exciting!

    I bet it was a great pleasure for you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Congratulations! Let me guess, the porter will be in this limited serie, right? :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ron, can you give us (or remind of) any details on the hopping?

    Was it hopped considerably more than any current Fuller's beer?

    If so, did it taste noticeably more bitter/aromatic?

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  12. Gary, it had the most hops per barrel. Then again, it was the strongest beer they brewed. In terms of hops per barrel, it was just a shade less than IPA and XKK (Bitter).

    ReplyDelete
  13. ealusceop, I doubt the Porter will be included. They already have one of those.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ron, thanks, but as compared say to Fuller's 1845, or the Vintage series Fuler's has put out, do you get the impression that this historical beer was much, much more bitter? Or not really.

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  15. Gary, I think XX is 54 or 56 EBU. It seemed hoppier than Vintage Ale to me.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Okay thanks. Very pleased to hear of this initiative.

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yeah I know for the porter, but I was thinking they were planning to brew an "old style", real secondary fermentation in wood Porter, no?

    ReplyDelete
  18. dang.....well I’ve just this Minute finished off a bottle of the 2009 vintage ale, so if this skill in special brews is anything to go by, I must try this beer!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Very interesting, I'd love to try it. Any word on if it will be available in the US?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Awesome, Ron! I just received my First Draught this week and saw the description. I was really excited to see it. I hope we get some of it here in the US. I agree re John. I interviewed him in person at the Fullers' Brewery late last year for an internet radio show here in the States. I can't imagine him doing anything half-arsed either.
    Cheers!
    Neil

    www.ScottishBrewing.com

    ReplyDelete
  21. Congratulations ron, cant wait to try it

    ReplyDelete
  22. Neil it would make a very interesting interview about historical brewing by Ron for the brewing network??

    ReplyDelete
  23. "What type of beer is it? I'd call it a Burton."

    I have a growing suspicion, with no real and actual evidence to back it up, that London brewers started calling their own strong ales "Burton ale" in the latter part of the 19th century to cash in on the popularity of genuine Burton Ale from the likes of Bass, Allsopp, Worthington and Salt, just the same way that brewers started calling (or seem to have started calling) any bitter of about 1060-1065 OG "IPA" to cash in on the popularity of Burton IPAs. Any evidence in the brewing logs to show if "London" ale was different from the brews sold as "Burton" ale?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Oblivious - great idea!

    I'm also with Korev - the recipe would be very interesting to have a go at - there's bugger all chance of finding a bottle in the few Fullers pubs up this way, so brewing it myself is likely to be the closest I'll get...

    ReplyDelete
  25. Here a link to the Fullers video:
    http://www.fullers.co.uk/rte.asp?id=377

    ReplyDelete