Which is where this little price list from Barclay Perkins comes in handy. It gives both the brewhouse and retail names of their beers.
KK was Burton and KKKK Old Burton. I bet you're wondering what those beers were like. Let's take a look, shall we?
First Barclay Perkins KK or Burton:
17th February Barclay Perkins 1933 KK | |||||
type | qtr | weight qtr | lbs | % | |
pale malt | Dereham | 8.5 | 336 | 2856 | 26.33 |
pale malt | Dereham MA | 10 | 336 | 3360 | 30.97 |
pale malt | Page SA | 5 | 336 | 1680 | 15.49 |
maize | 3 | 336 | 1008 | 9.29 | |
crystal malt | 1.5 | 336 | 504 | 4.65 | |
sugar | Martineau No.3 | 6 | 224 | 1344 | 12.39 |
sugar | caramel | 96 | 0.88 | ||
total | 34.00 | 10848 | 100.00 | ||
lbs | type | year | % | ||
hops | 90 | Fox MK Fuggles | 1931 | 33.09 | |
hops | 49 | 1930 | 18.01 | ||
hops | 42 | Saaz | 1930 | 15.44 | |
hops | 91 | Mainwaring MK Fuggles | 1930 | 33.46 | |
hops | 0 | 0.00 | |||
hops (lbs) | 272 | ||||
hops (lbs/barrel) | 1.69 | ||||
hops (lbs/qtr) | 8.00 | ||||
dry hops (oz/brl) | 3 | ||||
boil time (hours) | 2.25 | ||||
Hopping: | at inch: | 91 | Mainwaring MK Fuggles | 1930 | |
49 | 1930 | ||||
after 1 hour boil | 90 | Fox MK Fuggles | 1931 | ||
after 1.5 hour boil | 42 | Saaz | 1930 | ||
pitching temp (ºF) | 59 | ||||
gravity (lbs barrel) | 19.39 | ||||
gravity (OG) | 1053.70 | ||||
gravity (FG) | 1015.50 | ||||
ABV | 5.05 | ||||
apparent attenuation | 71.14% | ||||
barrels wort | 161 | ||||
extract (lbs/barrel/qtr) | 90.6 | ||||
extract | 3080.4 | ||||
Colour | 74 | ||||
Source: Barclay Perkins brewing records |
Now KKKK or Old Burton:
16th February Barclay Perkins 1933 KKKK | |||||
type | qtr | weight qtr | lbs | % | |
pale malt | Dereham | 5.625 | 336 | 1890 | 28.89 |
pale malt | H and D T PA | 10 | 336 | 3360 | 51.37 |
crystal malt | 1.375 | 336 | 462 | 7.06 | |
sugar | Martineau No.2 | 3 | 224 | 672 | 10.27 |
malt extract | 0.5 | 224 | 112 | 1.71 | |
sugar | caramel | 45 | 0.69 | ||
total | 20.50 | 6541 | 100.00 | ||
lbs | type | year | % | ||
hops | 110 | Reeves MK Golding Varieties | 1932 | 50.00 | |
hops | 55 | Reeves MK Goldings | 1931 | 25.00 | |
hops | 55 | 1930 | 25.00 | ||
hops (lbs) | 220 | ||||
hops (lbs/barrel) | 3.31 | ||||
hops (lbs/qtr) | 10.73 | ||||
dry hops (oz/brl) | 4 | ||||
boil time (hours) | 2.50 | ||||
Hopping: | at inch: | 55 | Reeves MK Goldings | 1931 | |
55 | 1930 | ||||
after 1 hour boil | 55 | Reeves MK Golding Varieties | 1932 | ||
after 1.5 hour boil | 55 | Reeves MK Golding Varieties | 1932 | ||
pitching temp (ºF) | 58 | ||||
gravity (lbs barrel) | 27.65 | ||||
gravity (OG) | 1076.60 | ||||
gravity (FG) | 1028.00 | ||||
ABV | 6.43 | ||||
apparent attenuation | 63.45% | ||||
barrels wort | 66.5 | ||||
extract (lbs/barrel/qtr) | 89.1 | ||||
extract | 1826.55 | ||||
Colour | 90 | ||||
Source: Barclay Perkins brewing records |
I was a bit surprised at how the grists differed. I'd expected the KKKK to be pretty much a scaled up version of KK. That's not the case. As you've no doubt noticed, KK was Californian malt, SA malt, MA (Mild Ale) malt, crystal malt, No.3 invert sugar and a touch of caramel. KKKK, on the other hand, contained Californian malt, PA malt, crystal malt, No.2 invert sugar and caramel.
And, despite being brewed on consecutive days, the hops used were almost completely different: all Goldings or Golding Varieties for KKKK: Golding Varieties, Fuggles and Saaz for KK.
At about 6.5% ABV, KKKK was about as strong as draught beer came in the 1930's.
And, because I'm such a generous soul, here are the equivalent beers from Fuller's. First their Burton, BO.
26th June 1935 Fuller's BO | |||||
type | qtr | weight qtr | lbs | % | |
pale malt | English | 19 | 326 | 6194 | 26.67 |
pale malt | Australian | 19 | 326 | 6194 | 26.67 |
pale malt | Australian | 16.5 | 326 | 5379 | 23.16 |
pale malt | Chilean | 2.5 | 326 | 815 | 3.51 |
flaked maize | 10 | 336 | 3360 | 14.47 | |
sugar | glucose | 3 | 224 | 672 | 2.89 |
sugar | Intense | 224 | 338 | 1.46 | |
sugar | Tri ?? BP | 224 | 235 | 1.01 | |
sugar | BP | 37 | 0.16 | ||
total | 70.00 | 23224 | 100.00 | ||
lbs | type | year | % | ||
hops | 131 | Pemfret | 1934 | 24.95 | |
hops | 394 | Suninens?? | 1934 | 75.05 | |
hops (lbs) | 525 | ||||
hops (lbs/barrel) | 1.6 | ||||
hops (lbs/qtr) | 7.50 | ||||
boil time (hours) | 1.5 | 1.75 | |||
pitching temp (ºF) | 60 | ||||
gravity (lbs barrel) | 20.20 | ||||
gravity (OG) | 1055.95 | ||||
gravity (FG) | 1014.40 | ||||
ABV | 5.50 | ||||
apparent attenuation | 74.26% | ||||
barrels wort | 515.5 | ||||
extract (lbs/barrel/qtr) | 93.94 | ||||
Source: Fuller's brewing records |
Now their Old Burton Extra:
26th June 1935 Fuller's OBE | |||||
type | qtr | weight qtr | lbs | % | |
pale malt | English | 19 | 326 | 6194 | 26.67 |
pale malt | Australian | 19 | 326 | 6194 | 26.67 |
pale malt | Australian | 16.5 | 326 | 5379 | 23.16 |
pale malt | Chilean | 2.5 | 326 | 815 | 3.51 |
flaked maize | 10 | 336 | 3360 | 14.47 | |
sugar | glucose | 3 | 224 | 672 | 2.89 |
sugar | Intense | 224 | 338 | 1.46 | |
sugar | Tri ?? BP | 224 | 235 | 1.01 | |
sugar | BP | 37 | 0.16 | ||
total | 70.00 | 23224 | 100.00 | ||
lbs | type | year | % | ||
hops | 131 | Pemfret | 1934 | 24.95 | |
hops | 394 | Suninens?? | 1934 | 75.05 | |
hops (lbs) | 525 | ||||
hops (lbs/barrel) | 1.9 | ||||
hops (lbs/qtr) | 7.50 | ||||
boil time (hours) | 1.5 | 1.75 | |||
pitching temp (ºF) | 60 | ||||
gravity (lbs barrel) | 24.40 | ||||
gravity (OG) | 1067.59 | ||||
gravity (FG) | 1019.94 | ||||
ABV | 6.30 | ||||
apparent attenuation | 70.49% | ||||
barrels wort | 515.5 | ||||
extract (lbs/barrel/qtr) | 93.94 | ||||
Source: Fuller's brewing records |
As BO and OBE were party-gyled with each other, the grist and hopping are identical.
So here are my definitions of 1930's Burton and Old Burton.
Burton: OG 1050-1055, 5-5.5% ABV, 80-100 EBC, 1.5-1.75 lbs hops/barrel.
Old Burton: OG 1065-1075, 6-7% ABV, 80-110 EBC, 2-3.5 lbs hops/barrel.
There. Two more new styles. What a productive day it's been.
Good stuff but does Papazian agree with your new style inventions? What I find so interesting is they would use 4 variations of a pale malt in recipes and the hops bill were a crapshoot. Is there a difference between Fox fuggles and Mainwaring fuggles? Did they ever make the same beer twice?
ReplyDeleteFirst Stater, I'll have to ask Charlie if he agrees next time I see him.
ReplyDeleteThey were just Fuggles from different producers or dealers.
They did make the same beer twice. Te whole point in using several types of pale malt (and several types of hops) is to even out any differences between different batches of ingredients. I assume large breweries who are very keen on cosistency do something similar today.
Fullers today by their malt from a number of different suppliers.
ReplyDeleteNice the Burton recipes!
ReplyDeleteAny idea what the BP first hop additions "at inch:" mean? How long was this addition boiled?
ReplyDeleteJeff, good question.
ReplyDeleteMy guess is: when all the wort was in the copper.
Inch usually refers to the level of liquid relative to the top of the vessel. It was how they measured the volume.
But I could be totally wrong. As it's a bit of jargon, that doesn't necessarily follow any logic.
The colon leads me to think that there is supposed to be a figure written in indicating the level of wort in the copper when the hops were added.
ReplyDeleteJeff, it always says "at inch" in the logs without any number after it.
ReplyDelete"at makeup" is another one.
Any idea what Pemfret or Suninens are? Should I just use goldings?
ReplyDeleteAny idea what hops Fullers was using? Should a modern brewer substitute goldings?
ReplyDeleteAny tips about the types of weird sugars used by Fuller's? I think the sugars are pretty important for this style, and if the first recipes of KK and KKKK are pretty clear with the Martineau N.3, the Fuller's sugars seems odd, and not used in so great a quantity.
ReplyDeleteIronman, they'll be the dealer or the growers name.
ReplyDeleteDuring WW I, when the hop industry came under government control, the different types of hops were classified into four groups: Goldings, Golding Varieties, Fuggle's and Tolhursts. Though many of the hops classified as Golding Varieties had little relation to Goldings. The differentiation was based as much on the use of the hops as on genetic relationship. Hops with the most delicate flavour were put into the Golding Varieties group. Such hops were often used for dry-hopping, while stronger flavoured Fuggle's and the lower-quality Tolhursts were used in the copper.
There were two main types of Golding Varieties. The Cobb, selected from a garden of Canterbury Whitebines in 1881, which had a good flavour but poor preservative power. It was very good as a dry hop. The Tutsham cropped well but was of only average quality.
Tolhursts were a collection of low-quality, but heavy-cropping, varieties which were widely planted after WW I, when new hop gardens needed to be developed quickly. By 1940 it had gone out of favour on account of its poor flavour and preservative power and was no longer widely grown.
ealusceop, Fullers used a lot of proprietary sugars. I'm not sure what they all are, but I would guess that at least some are dark caramelised sugar.
ReplyDelete@Ron: Big U.S. brewers do exactly as you suggest, using a whole variety of different hops (albeit at trivial levels) to bitter and flavor their products. Not only does it help to even out differences between batches, but also makes it easy to slightly tweak the recipe if one particular variety isn't available.
ReplyDeleteWhile it's seldom mentioned outright, I'd assume that historic brewers had a very keen appreciation of how hops degraded over time. It's very likely that they adjusted their recipes accordingly.
Do brewing logs show brewers using more hops when brewing using older hops?