The period around the Napoleonic Wars was a key moment in the development of Porter. Specifically, the development of black malt. The new wonder colouring material that arrived in 1817. Its effect on Porter grists was pretty dramatic. As the table below demonstrates.
Before we go any further, a word of explanation. For the percentages in the table, I've assumed a quarter of pale or amber malt weighs 336 poiunds and that a quarter of brown or black malt weighs 244. I'm pretty certain that they were using volume quarters in this period and not standardised 336 pound quarters. I could be wrong, but that's the assumption I've made.
And these are what the beer names mean:
TT = standard Porter
EI = Export India (Porter)
BSt = Brown Stout
FSt = Family Stout (I think)
Here's the table:
-->
Barclay Perkins beers 1812 - 1821
| |||||||||||||||||
Date
|
Year
|
Beer
|
Style
|
OG
|
FG
|
ABV
|
App. Atten-uation
|
lbs hops/ qtr
|
hops lb/brl
|
barrels
|
lbs hops
|
qtrs malt
|
Pitch temp
|
pale malt
|
brown malt
|
black malt
|
amber malt
|
29th Apr
|
1812
|
BSt
|
Stout
|
1076.2
|
1027.0
|
6.51
|
64.56%
|
9.57
|
4.01
|
836
|
3350
|
350
|
61º
|
60.31%
|
39.69%
|
0.00%
|
16.96%
|
16th Mar
|
1812
|
EI
|
Porter
|
1055.7
|
1016.0
|
5.25
|
71.26%
|
13.85
|
4.00
|
1159.75
|
4640
|
335
|
61º
|
59.40%
|
40.60%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
23rd Mar
|
1812
|
EI
|
Porter
|
1054.3
|
1016.0
|
5.07
|
70.53%
|
13.13
|
3.82
|
1150.75
|
4400
|
335
|
61º
|
60.10%
|
39.90%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
18th Mar
|
1812
|
FSt
|
Stout
|
1052.1
|
1016.0
|
4.77
|
69.28%
|
12.03
|
3.17
|
1214.5
|
3850
|
320
|
64.5º
|
59.45%
|
40.55%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
21st Mar
|
1812
|
FSt
|
Stout
|
1051.5
|
1015.5
|
4.77
|
69.92%
|
11.88
|
3.14
|
1209.75
|
3800
|
320
|
64º
|
60.95%
|
39.05%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
1st Apr
|
1812
|
FSt
|
Stout
|
1052.6
|
1015.5
|
4.91
|
70.55%
|
11.88
|
3.13
|
1214.5
|
3800
|
320
|
64º
|
57.93%
|
42.07%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
20th Mar
|
1812
|
TT
|
Porter
|
1052.6
|
1016.0
|
4.85
|
69.60%
|
9.78
|
2.50
|
1249.75
|
3130
|
320
|
66º
|
68.24%
|
31.76%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
25th Mar
|
1812
|
TT
|
Porter
|
1053.5
|
1015.8
|
4.99
|
70.54%
|
9.38
|
2.48
|
1209.75
|
3000
|
320
|
63º
|
72.44%
|
27.56%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
26th Jun
|
1812
|
TT
|
Porter
|
1051.2
|
1015.5
|
4.73
|
69.75%
|
7.19
|
1.95
|
1049
|
2050
|
285
|
63º
|
67.06%
|
32.94%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
6th Feb
|
1813
|
BSt
|
Stout
|
1075.3
|
1027.0
|
6.40
|
64.16%
|
11.14
|
4.89
|
797.75
|
3900
|
350
|
61º
|
60.31%
|
39.69%
|
0.00%
|
16.96%
|
27th Mar
|
1813
|
BSt
|
Stout
|
1075.3
|
1027.0
|
6.40
|
64.16%
|
9.57
|
4.22
|
793
|
3350
|
350
|
61º
|
56.30%
|
43.70%
|
0.00%
|
19.41%
|
5th Feb
|
1813
|
EI
|
Porter
|
1054.6
|
1016.0
|
5.10
|
70.68%
|
13.13
|
3.99
|
1101.5
|
4400
|
335
|
63.5º
|
58.66%
|
41.34%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
30th Mar
|
1813
|
FSt
|
Stout
|
1054.3
|
1016.0
|
5.07
|
70.53%
|
11.09
|
3.08
|
1154.25
|
3550
|
320
|
63.5º
|
60.95%
|
39.05%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
4th May
|
1813
|
TT
|
Porter
|
1052.6
|
1015.5
|
4.91
|
70.55%
|
8.75
|
2.39
|
1173.25
|
2800
|
320
|
73º
|
65.36%
|
34.64%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
3rd Jan
|
1821
|
BSt
|
Stout
|
1075.6
|
1027.0
|
6.43
|
64.30%
|
9.74
|
4.15
|
891
|
3700
|
380
|
63º
|
75.37%
|
23.81%
|
0.82%
|
9.37%
|
10th Jan
|
1821
|
BSt
|
Stout
|
1078.9
|
1027.0
|
6.87
|
65.80%
|
10.66
|
4.83
|
838.25
|
4050
|
380
|
63º
|
76.63%
|
22.58%
|
0.79%
|
9.33%
|
17th Jan
|
1821
|
BSt
|
Stout
|
1078.1
|
1027.0
|
6.76
|
65.44%
|
10.76
|
5.00
|
818
|
4090
|
380
|
63º
|
71.54%
|
27.57%
|
0.89%
|
9.49%
|
21st Mar
|
1821
|
EI
|
Porter
|
1059.3
|
1015.8
|
5.76
|
73.43%
|
14.32
|
4.28
|
1239.25
|
5300
|
370
|
64º
|
77.34%
|
21.30%
|
1.36%
|
0.00%
|
23rd Feb
|
1821
|
FSt
|
Stout
|
1057.6
|
1015.5
|
5.57
|
73.10%
|
12.57
|
3.63
|
1280.25
|
4650
|
370
|
63º
|
78.09%
|
21.25%
|
0.66%
|
0.00%
|
29th Jan
|
1821
|
S Ale
|
Small Ale
|
1051.8
|
1015.0
|
4.87
|
71.04%
|
14.88
|
3.75
|
674.75
|
2530
|
170
|
62.5º
|
100.00%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
1st Jan
|
1821
|
TT
|
Porter
|
1060.1
|
1016.0
|
5.84
|
73.38%
|
8.96
|
2.46
|
872.25
|
2150
|
240
|
65.5º
|
88.15%
|
11.06%
|
0.79%
|
0.00%
|
15th Jan
|
1821
|
TT
|
Porter
|
1060.1
|
1016.0
|
5.84
|
73.38%
|
9.29
|
2.57
|
1265.75
|
3250
|
350
|
64º
|
86.08%
|
13.10%
|
0.82%
|
0.00%
|
22nd Jan
|
1821
|
TT
|
Porter
|
1059.8
|
1016.0
|
5.80
|
73.26%
|
9.14
|
2.49
|
1285
|
3200
|
350
|
66º
|
85.04%
|
14.25%
|
0.71%
|
0.00%
|
25th May
|
1821
|
TT
|
Porter
|
1060.4
|
1015.5
|
5.94
|
74.33%
|
8.38
|
2.46
|
1261
|
3100
|
370
|
64.5º
|
84.47%
|
14.54%
|
0.99%
|
0.00%
|
Source:
| |||||||||||||||||
Barclay Perkins brewing records held at the London Metropolitan archives.
|
In 1812 and 1813, Barclay Perkins Stouts and Export India Porter grists contained about 40% brown malt. The Stouts also had 15-20% amber malt. Their bog-standard Porter (TT) contained about 30% brown malt. As this was a few year's before Wheeler's invention of the stuff, there's obviously no black malt in the grist.
In 1821, things are very different. The brown malt content of the Stouts had almost halved to 20-25%. As had the amber malt content, down to 9%. The reduction was even more for the Porter: it contained just 11 to 15% brown malt. Both Porter and Stouts around 1% black malt.
A great example of how a technological innovation can transform the way a beer is brewed. And its character.
Wonderful, I already missed your contributions on the item "stout"for a few days!
ReplyDeleteDo you think it was innovation or economics that caused the drop in brown malt? If it wasn't cheaper I think that we'd still have high percentage brown porters until this day.
ReplyDeleteInteresting that they were making a 100% pale malt "small ale" as early as 1821. And it had a higher hopping rate per barrel than the TT porter, which has the lowest hops per barrel of any of the brews.
ReplyDeleteI suspect you're right about the FSt being "family stout" rather than, say "foreign stout", because its hop rate is the lowest of the stouts, and while its gravity is much the same as the porter it seems to earn its "stout" name by containing more brown malt than the porter, in both the pre-Wheeler and post-Wheeler iterations, which presumably gave a slightly sweeter flavour, making it more acceptable to "family" drinkers (although looking at the comparative FGs and attenuations, it may be I don't know what I'm talking about …)
First Stater, a combination of the two. Brewers were looking for a cheaper way to colour Porter than a large proportion of brown malt. The innovation of black malt made this possible.
ReplyDeleteThe third factor at play was legislative: the law preventing the use of anything but malt for colouring.
The interplay of these three factors brought about the new type of Porter grist.
At least at Barclay Perkins, they were still using very similar grists 40 years later.