The first reference I've come across to Best Mild is Barclay Perkins XX. This is the beer that appeared in 1931, after a big hike in beer duty. Brewers responded by slashing gravities. Especially of Mild. Barclay Perkins dropped the gravity of their X Ale from 1043 to 1037. But introduced a new beer, XX Ale, at the old X Ale gravity. X was marketed as "Ale", XX as "Best Ale".
WW II saw the gravity of standard Mild drop to 1028. Or the just-about-intoxicating-if-we-attenuate-the-hell-out-of-it level. Postwar, Mild gravities remained at their low wartime level, but some brewers introduced slightly stronger versions. These were sold under the name of Best Mild. Not that they were particularly strong, just 1034 to 1036. Still, better than a 1028 beer.
Lees Best Mild appeared in 1946. It initially had a gravity of 1033 and was party-gyled with K, Lees standard Mild. By 1952, it was being brewed on its own, though in much smaller batches - just 40 barrels, as opposed to 110 barrels of K. By this time there was a significant difference between K and Best Mild: the colour. K was 35 EBC, Best Mild 100. The grists had diverged considerably. K was brewed from pale malt, crystal malt and sugar. The Best Mild grist additionally included brown and black malt.
Before I started looking at actual brewing records, this was the sort of Dark Mild grist I'd expected to find. Ones with dark malts in them, rather than dark sugars. This looks a really tasty beer. Especially for the low gravity. Please brew it and send me a few bottles.
My bullshit is done. Time for Kristen and the detailed recipe . . . . .
JW Lees - 1952 - Best Mild
| |||||||||
General info: Finally. FINALLY! This is one beer I've been wanting to do for a long time. This is the stuff my granddad would always drink before my mum was born. Pictures at the old pub with the Lee's Best Mild in hand. What would it have been like to have a pint with the man I’ve always thought? Well, seeing that he went tits up in 1989 it’s not likely I get the chance in the near future. However, I can still drink what he did. Here it is. This one’s for you Mr. Tythcott.
| |||||||||
Beer Specifics
|
Recipe by percentages
| ||||||||
Gravity (OG)
|
1.035
|
72.5% English Pale malt
|
1.9% Black malt
| ||||||
Gravity (FG)
|
1.008
|
3.9%
|
13.8% Invert No1
| ||||||
ABV
|
3.50%
|
3.8% Chocolate malt
|
2% Caramel colorant
| ||||||
Apparent attenuation
|
75.97%
|
2% Brown malt
| |||||||
Real attenuation
|
62.23%
| ||||||||
IBU
|
27.0
|
Mash
|
90min@149°F
|
1.17qt/lb
| |||||
SRM
|
51
|
90min@65°C
|
2.44L/kg
| ||||||
EBC
|
100.5
| ||||||||
Boil
|
1.75 hours
| ||||||||
Homebrew @ 70%
|
Craft @ 80%
| ||||||||
Grist
|
5gal
|
19L
|
10bbl
|
10hl
| |||||
English Pale malt
|
4.74
|
lb
|
2.158
|
kg
|
257.09
|
lb
|
99.33
|
kg
| |
0.26
|
lb
|
0.117
|
kg
|
13.99
|
lb
|
5.41
|
kg
| ||
Chocolate malt
|
0.25
|
lb
|
0.114
|
kg
|
13.55
|
lb
|
5.24
|
kg
| |
Brown malt
|
0.13
|
lb
|
0.059
|
kg
|
7.00
|
lb
|
2.70
|
kg
| |
Black malt
|
0.12
|
lb
|
0.057
|
kg
|
6.78
|
lb
|
2.62
|
kg
| |
Invert No1
|
0.90
|
lb
|
0.411
|
kg
|
48.97
|
lb
|
18.92
|
kg
| |
Caramel colorant
|
2.13
|
oz
|
60.9
|
g
|
7.21
|
lb
|
2.79
|
kg
| |
6.403
|
2.915
|
354.59803
| |||||||
Hops
| |||||||||
Fuggle 5.5% 90min
|
0.86
|
oz
|
24.4
|
g
|
53.42
|
oz
|
1.291
|
kg
| |
Fuggle 5.5% 30min
|
0.29
|
oz
|
8.1
|
g
|
17.81
|
oz
|
0.430
|
kg
| |
Fermentation
|
63°F /17.2°C
| ||||||||
Yeast
| |||||||||
1318
| |||||||||
Tasting Notes:
Very dark, nearly black, with brilliant ruby highlights. Biscuits, chocolate and a good dose of licorice. Dark caramel and rich dark fruit…cherries and plums. Finishes dry but with a good dose of mouth heft to keep from being watery. Definitely a top notch mild and one that everyone should make at least once.
| |||||||||
Will definitely find time at some point for doing this.
ReplyDeleteVery much looking forward to brewing this! Thanks as always for great info.
ReplyDeleteKristen. The surname is Lees. Please rearrange your apostrophe and if brewing this beer, send me some.
ReplyDeleteDo you have a Lees' brown ale recipe for comparison, Ron, by any chance?
ReplyDeleteMartyn, funnily enough, there's no Brown Ale in the logs. So . . .
ReplyDeleteit could be Bottling Beer. A marginally stronger version of K Mild. And 35 EBC in colour. Or Best Mild bottled.
Tandleman's,
ReplyDeleteSorry, that should have been Lees' or is it Lees's? Even the US Supreme court can't get it right.
http://www.abanet.org/soloseznet/threads/0610/grammar.html
Martyn and Ron,
Im betting its the K ale. The Mild is just to roasty. The K, with the sugars as everyone will see, is more nearly right. I'm making it this weekend and will be able to give you a better idear.
Kristens
Are you using Lyle's Golden as the invert #1?
ReplyDeleteI will make this one tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteAnthony, I will be using Invert No 1 but it can be a pain to get hold of. Golden Syrup is probably the best readily available substitute so I would use that quite happily. The flavour of number 1 is similar to the golden syrup but seems to have a more honeyish taste.
I agree with Mentaldental. No1 is more of a honeyed character whereas Lyles is more toffee. Its only 50% invert. I personally use No1 invert but have many times in the past used Lyles when in a pinch. Also remember that we aren't trying to clone a beer currently made so the difference to each person would be unseen. That being said, follow as closely as makes sense to you.
ReplyDeleteJust started drinking mine. Kristen's description is pretty good so I won't add to it, other than to say, "By 'eck, this is a lovely beer!"
ReplyDeleteGood work R & K.
Thank you for posting, used this as a starting point to brew a mild with slightly darker invert, EKG instead of Fuggels and White Shield yeast for Flix Brewhouse ProAm which will be at GABF this year.
ReplyDeleteDrinking this one now and have to say this is one fine mild.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to brew this beer this week. A few questions - i don't have access to the caramel colorant - and was thinking of subbing in a little carafa special 3 for the color effect. Seem reasonable? Also, I'm worried about the FG - and getting too much attenuation. I was thinking of pushing up the mash temp to 156F. Has the experience been that mashing at 152 - and fermenting with 1318 - gets you down to the expected FG? Thanks!
ReplyDeletePaul Galardy,
ReplyDeleteas long as the carafa doesn't add too much flavour it should be OK. No-one has complained so far of the FG being too low.
Looking forward to try this recipe. But I have a question about the caramel colorant. Does it add any sugar to the OG? Any flavor? Aroma? I assume it's a dark colorant, am I right? I don't know if there's anything similar available where I'm from, so I have to come up with a replacement just in case.
ReplyDeletePyramid Head,
ReplyDeletethe amount of caramel is too small to change the OG. It would dd flavour, though.
Question re: caramel colorant. The only one I can get as a homebrewer is the liquid variety. Putting sufficient to achieve 2% of the grist seems rather a lot - it comes in 100ml bottles!
ReplyDeleteAnonymous,
ReplyDeleteas caramel comes of very different shades, you should sdd enough to hit the required colour.