To avoid any confusion, this wasn’t the ancestor of Courage Russian Stout. That was the successor to the Imperial Stout of Barclay Perkins, a brewery bought up by Courage in the 1950s.
No surprises in the grist, which is the London holy trinity of pale, brown and black malt. As is often the case, the type of sugar wasn’t specified in the brewing record. I’ve guessed No. 2 invert. Mostly because No. 3 or No. 4 results in a beer which seems too dark. Though in 1916 Courage did use No. 4 invert in their Porter and Stout.
Two types of English hops were used, one from the 1914 harvest, the other from 1913, but cold stored. So, all pretty fresh, really, considering this beer was brewed in March. I’ve guessed for Fuggles and Goldings, as they seem the most probable varieties.
1915 Courage Imperial Stout | ||
pale malt | 12.50 lb | 58.82% |
brown malt | 4.25 lb | 20.00% |
black malt | 2.25 lb | 10.59% |
No. 2 invert sugar | 2.25 lb | 10.59% |
Fuggles 90 mins | 2.75 oz | |
Goldings 30 mins | 2.75 oz | |
Goldings dry hops | 1.00 oz | |
OG | 1094 | |
FG | 1025 | |
ABV | 9.13 | |
Apparent attenuation | 73.40% | |
IBU | 47 | |
SRM | 60 | |
Mash at | 152º F | |
Sparge at | 165º F | |
Boil time | 90 minutes | |
pitching temp | 58º F | |
Yeast | Wyeast 1099 Whitbread Ale |
Would this have had a long secondary/vatted with brettanomyces?
ReplyDeleteHave you had a recreation of one of the Imperials from this era? I'm wondering what they're like with such a big percentage of dark malt.
ReplyDeleteI brewed the 1914 version a while back, which has no sugars, and it was great, way smoother than one would imagine
DeleteI brewed the 1914 version of this. Bottled clean, no Brett, it was right at about 1.030FG. I tasted one bottle after four weeks and it tasted great if not a bit green. Full of chocolate, coffee, toffee. I used Kristen's heavier hopping rates and it didn't taste overly bitter at all. I'm very much looking forward to a six month tasting when a buddy comes visiting in a few weeks.
ReplyDeletecomments say #2 invert, but recipe says #3.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletets,
ReplyDeletewell spotted. I've fixed it.
RCairns86,
ReplyDeleteyes. It was probably aged for at least 12 months.