Let's start off with some figures because, if a picture paints a thousand words, numbers are at least good for a few hundred.
The effect of WW I on British brewing | |||||
Year | Production (bulk barrels) | Production (standard barrels) | Exports (standard barrels) | Imports (standard barrels) | Average OG |
1913 | 34,805,291 | 33,286,515 | 651,768 | 1052.60 | |
1914 | 37,558,767 | 36,056,416 | 74,205 | 1052.80 | |
1915 | 34,765,780 | 32,964,280 | 481,183 | 49,790 | 1052.15 |
1916 | 32,110,608 | 30,289,061 | 19,700 | 1051.88 | |
1917 | 30,163,988 | 26,621,091 | 1048.54 | ||
1918 | 19,085,043 | 13,814,101 | 16 | 1039.81 | |
1919 | 23,264,533 | 12,922,391 | 1030.55 | ||
1920 | 35,047,947 | 25,113,447 | 317,167 | 590 | 1039.41 |
1921 | 34,504,570 | 26,731,631 | 1042.61 | ||
1922 | 30,178,731 | 23,528,436 | 260,914 | 4,033 | 1042.88 |
1923 | 23,948,651 | 18,601,570 | 257,454 | 7,017 | 1042.72 |
1924 | 25,425,017 | 19,896,231 | 262,668 | 1,392,576 | 1043.04 |
1925 | 26,734,825 | 20,960,103 | 266,933 | 1,545,953 | 1043.12 |
1926 | 26,765,610 | 21,037,769 | 295,488 | 1,576,381 | 1043.23 |
1927 | 25,100,461 | 19,751,781 | 276,758 | 1,349,515 | 1043.28 |
1928 | 25,435,145 | 19,964,277 | 328,029 | 1,427,174 | 1043.17 |
1929 | 24,608,000 | 19,283,724 | 352,942 | 1043.10 | |
1930 | 25,061,956 | 19,548,326 | 328,524 | 1,522,906 | 1042.90 |
1931 | 23,900,000 | 18,468,182 | 289,516 | 1042.50 | |
1932 | 20,790,812 | 15,513,726 | 244,525 | 1,373,450 | 1041.04 |
1933 | 17,950,303 | 12,898,109 | 217,981 | 1,203,063 | 1039.52 |
1934 | 20,182,308 | 15,041,324 | 213,813 | 1,276,270 | 1040.99 |
1935 | 20,864,814 | 15,576,532 | 224,087 | 1,332,277 | 1041.06 |
1936 | 21,969,763 | 16,385,449 | 311,663 | 1,392,457 | 1041.02 |
1937 | 22,724,450 | 16,981,362 | 329,498 | 1,385,833 | 1041.10 |
1938 | 24,205,631 | 18,053,000 | 271,114 | 1,163,046 | 1041.02 |
1939 | 24,674,992 | 18,362,680 | 274,272 | 838,269 | 1040.93 |
Sources: | |||||
Brewers' Almanack 1928, p. 110, 115 | |||||
Brewers' Almanack 1955, p. 50, 51, 57 | |||||
Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser - Friday 17 April 1914, page 12. | |||||
Statistical Handbook of the British Beer & Pub Association 2005, p. 7 |
I've included the standard barrel* figure because that highlight more accurately the decline in beer production as it takes into account the fall in gravity as well as the fall in volume. You can see that in 1932 in terms of standard barrels beer output was only around a third of what it had been in 1914.
The effect on beer gravity is very obvious. Average OG remained 10 points or more lower than it had been in 1914. On the eve of WW II in 1939, average gravity was 22% lower than on the eve of WW I.
The fall in exports was equally dramatic, falling to about a third of the 1913 level before levelling off about 50% down. Though this fall wasn't evenly spread around the UK. Scottish brewers were much more successful in hanging onto their export markets than their English colleagues. As can be seen from this table:
Beer Exported on Drawback
and Free of Duty
|
|||||
England and Wales
|
Scotland
|
Ireland
|
United
Kingdom
|
UK exports
|
|
1916
|
581,947
|
174,595
|
46,371
|
802,913
|
|
1917
|
314,333
|
73,896
|
30,095
|
418,324
|
|
1918
|
174,408
|
30,379
|
16,185
|
220,972
|
|
1919
|
470,794
|
195,995
|
33,821
|
700,610
|
|
1920
|
312,868
|
146,726
|
16,698
|
485,292
|
390,248
|
1921
|
215,719
|
92,193
|
12,648
|
320,560
|
|
1922
|
207,882
|
117,978
|
10,239
|
336,099
|
260,914
|
1923
|
176,913
|
108,544
|
2,270
|
287,727
|
257,454
|
1924
|
158,373
|
132,889
|
753
|
292,015
|
264,003
|
1925
|
180,731
|
145,603
|
415
|
326,749
|
290,824
|
1926
|
178,155
|
168,609
|
305
|
347,069
|
283,033
|
1927
|
156,258
|
179,242
|
232
|
338,732
|
287,445
|
1928
|
170,728
|
193,255
|
363,983
|
328,029
|
|
1929
|
176,381
|
223,638
|
400,019
|
352,942
|
|
1930
|
173,988
|
204,345
|
378,333
|
328,524
|
|
1931
|
159,278
|
147,527
|
306,805
|
289,516
|
|
1932
|
136,231
|
133,240
|
269,471
|
244,525
|
|
1933
|
117,363
|
126,254
|
243,617
|
217,981
|
|
Sources:
|
|||||
Brewers'
Journal 1919, page 65,
|
|||||
Brewers'
Journal 1922, page 71.
|
|||||
Brewers'
Journal 1925, page 83.
|
|||||
Brewers'
Journal 1928, page 87.
|
|||||
Brewers'
Journal 1928, page 87.
|
|||||
Brewers'
Journal 1934, page 162.
|
|||||
Brewers'
Almanack 1928, p. 115
|
|||||
Brewers'
Almanack 1955, p. 57
|
The net result being that by the 1930's Scottish brewers were exporting more beer than English brewers. Quite an achievement given the relative sizes of the English and Scottish brewing industries.
The war indirectly also affected beer imports. If you consider the move to Irish independence to have been set in motion during the war. Those million plus barrels suddenly being imported to Britain are, of course, virtually all Guinness. It had been the largest brewery in the UK in 1914. Ultimately Irish independence led to Guinness building a brewery in London in the 1930's.
* A standard barrel is 36 gallons of beer with an OG of 1055ยบ.
Save for the 1919 dip and the odd rise over 1041 after, you have essentially by 1918 the same average OG you had by 1939.
ReplyDeleteI would argue that the war accelerated the pressure by many observers in the late 1800's to have a basic beer similar in gravity to European lager, which was about 4% ABV. Charles Graham and many others called for this change, and it finally happened, hastened by the pressure of tax changes and the need to promote factory safety and efficiency.
In other words I think this was a long-term change, which has some irony in that lager finally went the other way, stabilizing to its current 5% ABV. Just yesterday I noticed Stella Artois, an import in Canada, advertising that it was originally introduced as a high quality Christmas item.
Given it is 5% ABV, I would infer that the standard lager (or beer) of the brewery before that was lower in gravity, else what would have made it special for Xmas?. This ties in with lager generally rising to 5% ABV in the 1900's. Yet bitter and mild fell to an average of 4% ABV by 1939.
The English should have pushed to keep average ABV at least this high because it would tend to keep the quality of the drink up.
IMO, at least in part, production of bulk barrels fell because beer quality, in this sense, fell. I don't discount the effect of other drinks becoming popular, the Depression, and the rising cost per pint, but reducing strength over this 25 year period had a obvious impact on consumption, IMO.
People won't necessarily drink more to get the same intake in alcohol, in other words.